logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.06.21 2018고단1024
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주치상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Any person who takes over an automobile registered in violation of the Automobile Management Act, shall apply for the registration of transfer of ownership to the competent authorities;

Nevertheless, on January 23, 2018, the Defendant purchased and received KRW 2.7 million from a person who is unable to know his/her name on the roads near Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-do, in the name of C, for the purchase of the DN Scoo vehicle in the name of C and then did not file an application for the registration of transfer of the ownership from March 29, 2018 without justifiable grounds until March 29, 2018.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA scoo vehicle in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (or the injury) and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (or the injury).

On January 26, 2018, the Defendant continued to drive a five-lane radius near the bus stops in front of the F hotel in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, in the direction of the prosperity distance, using five-lanes towards the shooting distance of the modern department store at the speed of about 85km.

At the time, it is night and its place is 60 km speed, so there was a duty of care to safely drive an automobile driver while complying with the speed limit, properly seeing the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and proceeded with a limited speed exceeding approximately 25 km per hour, and caused the Defendant to have the bus platform facilities on the right side of the instant four-way coo-coo-gu vehicle located in the front of the instant four-way coo-gu vehicle, moving back from the front side of the sea-going end to the shooting distance of the modern department store G (51 Do) driving on the right side of the instant four-way coo-gu vehicle. This led to the Defendant’s failure to take part in the left side of the instant four-way coo-gu vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by occupational negligence, inflicted injury on the victim, such as salt, tension, etc. in the cryp of the cryp that requires approximately three weeks of treatment.

arrow