1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

1. The scope of the judgment of this court in this case, among the articles listed in the separate sheet No. 2 published by the Defendant, the Plaintiff asserted that “the Plaintiff had a bid visa unfairly involved in the process of the examination of the instant tender to be selected by K as an external production company of the instant program 2 at the time of the instant program,” and that “the Plaintiff has a disciplinary power against the Plaintiff subject to the disposition of reducing the salary for three months in relation to the embezzlement of the I production costs in 201 and the embezzlement of the I production costs in 2011” (hereinafter “the second dispute suit”) were false, and claimed for corrective reports and damages.

For this reason, the first instance court ordered a corrective report on this part because the first issue part is false, and ordered a part of the claim for damages, and ordered a dismissal of the plaintiff's remaining claims.

Therefore, since only the defendant appealed, only the part on the claim for the corrective report and the part on the claim for damages cited in the first instance court falls under the scope of the judgment of this court.

2. The reasoning for this part of the lower court’s reasoning is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the first instance, and thus, this part is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

3. Determination as to the request for a corrective report

A. The plaintiff's assertion in each of the articles of this case reported the first dispute that "the plaintiff had unfairly involved in the process of examining the tender of this case so that K would be selected as an external manufacturer of the Pison 2 at the time of the program of this case." However, the first dispute was false, and the plaintiff's honor was damaged by the report of the above false facts.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to make a corrective report as to each article of this case, such as the purport of the claim.

B. In order to establish defamation by reporting of the relevant legal principles as to whether a statement of fact was made, the victim’s social assessment may be lowered.