logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.10.27 2017나2029604
정정보도
Text

1. The remainder of the judgment of the court of first instance, excluding the dismissed part of the lawsuit, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant is not the defendant.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this part is cited by the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. The reasoning for this part of the court’s determination as to the legitimacy of the claim for a corrective statement as indicated in the Attachment 1-1 is as stated in Paragraph 2 of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, and therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

3. Judgment on the merits

A. The plaintiff's assertion that "L and M have a special human relationship (this case's No. 1 and No. 2)" (this case's No. 1 and No. 2) is true (the "O dispute fact" hereinafter), ② "L had an internal examiner conduct an internal examiner's selection examination (the first and second articles of this case's No. 1 and No. 2), ③ "An external examiner is composed of persons connected with L and BS academic societies, etc. (the number of actual participants in the program of this case)" (iv) "the number of actual participants in the program of this case is nothing more than 100 (the number of actual participants in the program of this case's No. 5,6, 7, 8, 9). The defendant was obligated to intervene in the news report of this case in the process of producing the article to inform the whole world of the contents of the program of this case's No. 1, but the defendant made the article of this case's corrective news article of this case's No. 34).

B. The reasons why this court is stated in this part of the judgment of the first instance court as to the facts of issues Nos. 1 to 5 are 3- Of the reasons for the judgment

C. Inasmuch as the provisions of paragraphs (1) through (5) are the same, they shall be quoted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

(c) 6.

arrow