(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.06.01 2018나2010324

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울고등법원 2018.06.01 2018나2010324

정정보도 등

Text

1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance is revoked, and the plaintiff's claim corresponding to that part is dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. The scope of the judgment of this court in this case is the part of the article No. 1 of the article No. 1 of the "H" (hereinafter referred to as the "H") among the article No. 2 of the defendant's report, and the separate agreement entered into with the labor union of the E University Medical Center (hereinafter referred to as the "part No. 2") stating that wages shall be paid on the condition of the failure to return to work of the Gangwon Labor Union (hereinafter referred to as "the part No. 2"), and the part of the "F Trade Union Chairperson, known as the mother of the FF union, prepared a written agreement that the chairperson of the FF union does not return to the university hospital where he/she is in his/her own possession (hereinafter referred to as the "third part"), and the part of the non-performance penalty and the part of the non-performance penalty, known to him/her, could not be subject to criticism of the chairperson of the A before receiving compensation for the "non-labor wages" (hereinafter referred to as "non-performance penalty and the part of the non-performance penalty shall be corrected."

For this, the first instance court rendered a judgment dismissing the remainder of the plaintiff's claims, ① order for a corrective report, ⑤ order for a corrective report, citing part of the charge for compelling compliance and the claim for damages.

Accordingly, only the defendant appealed, which was cited in the first instance trial. ① The part concerning the corrective report, enforcement fine, and damages claim are limited to the scope of the judgment of this court.

2. The reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition to the part of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, this part of the judgment is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Pursuant to the first sentence of the first sentence, “employment stability, withdrawal of disciplinary action,” after September 15, 1998.

참조조문

-민사소송법 제420조

유사 판례

-서울고등법원 2018.08.24 2018나2006066

-서울고등법원 2017.10.27 2017나2000108

-울산지방법원 2019.10.17 2019구합150

-부산지방법원 2019.06.21 2018구합1849

-춘천지방법원 2014.08.29 2014구합4038