logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.11.08 2017고단68
상해
Text

Defendant

B The defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million, and the defendant A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 4, 2016, Defendant A: (a) asked the victim B about the date of hospitalization and discharge at the F Hospital emergency room located in Yasan-gu, Yasan-si; (b) asked the victim B about the date of hospitalization and discharge; (c) but the victim did not inform the victim of the date of hospitalization and discharge; and (d) assault the victim by drinking the victim’s chest by drinking the victim’s chest, and by drinking the victim’s breath’s bat.

2. Defendant B, at the time, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph (1), the victim A, who is a patient at a hospital, was influenced with the victim’s bridge by walking the victim’s bridge at several times, thereby causing injury to the victim, which requires approximately six weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the Defendants’ legal statements

1. The legal statements of the witness B and A in part;

1. Some statements made in the police interrogation protocol against B or A;

1. A medical certificate (No. 14 once a year);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing the area of patient records;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Defendant A who choose a fine: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Defendant A who choose a fine: Selection of a fine; Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination on the Defendants’ assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. Defendant B

가. 주장의 요지 A이 먼저 피고인 B의 가슴을 때리고 멱살을 잡은 상태에서, 방어차원에서 A의 허벅지를 2회 때린 것으로, 피고인 B의 위와 같은 행위는 정당 방위에 해당하고, A이 입은 상해는 기왕 증 또는 사건 이후 발생한 다른 원인에 기인한 것에 불과 하다. 나. 판단 (1) 피고인 B이 A을 폭행하여 상해를 가한 사실이 있는지 여부 이 법원이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정들, 즉 ⓛ A은 수사기관 이래 법정에 이르기까지 ‘ 공소사실 기재 일시경 F 병원 직원인 피고인 B과 시비를 벌이던 중, 피고인 B이 발로 A의 손과 다리를 수회 걷어찼다’ 는...

arrow