logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.02.07 2017고정2265
폭행
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 18, 2017, around 13:50 on June 13, 2017, Defendant A assaulted the victim’s chin, breast, etc. to the head of the city where the victim B(66 years old) was used in the five-story toilets of the hospital D Hospital located in Busan-gu Busan-gu, Busan-do.

2. Defendant B, at the time, and at the place specified in paragraph 1, assaulted by the victim A (44 years) and the victim’s hand during the time of trial as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant B's partial statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect against the defendant B;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of partial police officers against the defendant A;

1. Police investigation report (applicable Acts and subordinate statutes to the attachment of suspect A’s body photo and written diagnosis of injury);

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. The defendant B asserts that the judgment on the claim by the defendant B of Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of each of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order constitutes a legitimate defense, since the victim first gets at the time of the defendant, and the victim was a citizen of the victim's interest in the defensive vehicle.

In light of the motive, the process and degree of the dispute between the defendant and the victim recognized by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the crime of this case is deemed to have been committed by the defendant beyond the passive defensive act, and such act does not meet the requirement of legitimate defense.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.

arrow