Text
The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.
Reasons
(2) On April 25, 2018, the Defendant, a member of the C Bank D branch located in Ansan-si, a member of the C Bank D branch located in the Seoul Bank D branch located in the Dong-gu, Ansan-si, and notified the account number of the C Bank account (number G; hereinafter “instant account”) in the name of F retired from the company run by the Defendant, and changed the mobile phone number notified of the details of the above account from H to “H” to “I”, and the password of the above account from “*******”, respectively.
Accordingly, the defendant changed the F's electronic records related to certification of fact with a view to making business process smooth.
2. The Defendant and the defense counsel’s assertion argues that the instant account was an account in the name of the Defendant and opened by stealing the name of the Defendant, and only requested changes in the notification number and password of transaction, knowing that the instant account was an account in the name of another person.
3. In full view of the following circumstances revealed through the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court, the evidence alone presented by the prosecutor was intended to obstruct the Defendant’s business performance.
It is insufficient to recognize that there was an intentional act or an intentional act of alteration.
① Employees E of the C Bank D branch stated to the effect that “Defendant first known the account number of the instant account and requested the change of a mobile phone number in the notification of transaction details. Defendant, after entering the account number, stated to the effect that Defendant was able to process the change of a mobile phone number by allowing him/her to enter the password of the instant account and then changed the password.”
However, the Defendant consistently and consistently from the investigative agency to this court, who received contact from J on April 24, 2018 that he/she had a e-mail card under his/her name, and recovered the e-mail card (the card number K; hereinafter “instant e-mail card”).