1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following two parts. As such, the reasoning of the court's explanation is as is stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the CPA.

Under the 6th sentence of the first instance court, the term “4,072,259 won” of the second sentence is “4,003,168 won,” the term “2,850,581 won” of the third sentence is “2,80,217 won,” and the term “2,850,581 won” of the second sentence under the 7th sentence is “2,802,217 won,” respectively.

B. Under the fourth and fourth of the judgment of the court of first instance, "the calculation table of the amount of damages" as stated in the attached Table "the calculation table of the amount of damages" (as the first day, last day, and unit price of the period among the lost income under the above calculation table, the total amount of the lost income was modified to KRW 4,003,168, and the amount of property damages after offsetting negligence was modified to KRW 2,802,217, respectively, according to the correction of the unit price of wages among the lost income under the above calculation table), the plaintiff's claim of this case was accepted within the above recognition scope, and the remaining claim is dismissed due to the lack of reasonable grounds. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.