1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 4,000,000 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from April 23, 2018 to August 21, 2019; and (b).

1. According to the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 5 of the facts of recognition, the Defendant is found to have been indicted for having sent text messages that may cause sexual humiliation and aversion using mobile phones to the Plaintiff on several occasions (the Defendant stated in the facts of crime refers to “the Defendant,” and the victim refers to “the Plaintiff”) as stated in the following facts of crime, and was sentenced to a fine of KRW 3 million from this court due to a violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (obscenity using communications media) on February 15, 2019.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant was between the victim A (n, 55 years of age) and the annual relationship.

1. On April 23, 2018, at around 01:54, the Defendant sent text messages to the victim’s cell phone using the Defendant’s cell phone to satisfy his/her sexual desire at the Defendant’s house located in the Busan Northern-gu, Busan, to the effect that he/she taken the victim’s chests into his/her cell phone, and that “the Defendant made the victim his/her cell phone operated with a smile of the smile under the smile.”

2. At around 02:53 of the same day, the Defendant sent text messages to the victim’s mobile phone using the Defendant’s mobile phone for the purpose of meeting his own sexual desire at the same place, stating that “the victim’s cell phone knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife is created,” and sent text messages of the same content to seven times in total on the same day.

As a result, the Defendant sent to the victim letters, pictures, etc. that may cause sexual humiliation or aversion through communications media with a view to meeting his/her sexual desire.

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff, the victim of the crime of this case, is obvious in light of the empirical rule that he had suffered considerable mental suffering from the criminal act of this case. Thus, the defendant is about the mental suffering suffered by the plaintiff