1. Defendant A’s fine of KRW 3 million, Defendant G, H, and B is KRW 700,000,000,000 for each fine of KRW 1.5 million, Defendant C, F, E, and D respectively.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a cab technician belonging to Jno-K branch, Defendant C is the head of the above labor union L division, Defendant H, Defendant F, and Defendant B are the above labor union members, Defendant G is a cab engineer belonging to the limited company M, respectively, and Defendant G is the above labor union members, Defendant G is the cab engineer belonging to N, Defendant E is the cab engineer belonging to the above labor union and the above labor union members, Defendant E is the above labor union members, and Defendant D is the cab engineer belonging to P.

After the implementation of multiple labor union system, the Defendants established a branch of the labor union belonging to Q Co., Ltd and the limited company L Co., Ltd. located in Seojin-gu Q Co., Ltd. in the Jeonjin-gu in the Jeonjin-gu in the Jeonjin-gu in the Jeonjin-gu in the Jeonjin-gu in the Jeonjin-gu in the Jeonjin-gu in the Jeonjin-gu

1. The Defendants’ co-principal

A. On July 11, 2012, from around 17:55 to 20:50, the Defendants, in front of the entrance of the said limited liability company, agreed on the floor so that the victims S, the representative director of the said company, and the victims T, who are the former employees of the said company, could not use electricity to the tent used by the Defendants as the Trade Union office, and could not turn off if they did not turn off. They agreed on the floor so that the victims could not get out of the said company, and allowed the victims to stop their vehicles for the Trade Union at the entrance of the said entrance, after completing their duties by placing the said vehicles for the Trade Union at the entrance.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly detained victims.

B. From July 12, 2012 to 20:55 on July 12, 2012 to 20:20: (a) the Defendants were around the entrance of the said limited liability company MU; and (b) the said provision

The victims were confined to prevent them from leaving the company for the same reasons as the statements in the claim.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly detained victims.

2. Defendant A around July 12, 2012, around 19:36, at the vicinity of the Mgate of the above limited liability company, Defendant A and other union members are as described in the preceding paragraph 1(b).