1. The defendant shall make to the plaintiffs the money stated in the "amount claimed" column in the separate sheet of damages compensation and each of the above money.

1. Basic facts

A. On February 14, 2005, the Defendant acquired the land owned by the Defendant’s road construction promotion and the Plaintiffs’ acquisition of the land, pursuant to the Gyeonggi-do Public Notice I, paid the Plaintiffs an amount of compensation indicated in each “consultation Acquisition” column as listed below, and acquired each land indicated in each “consultation Acquisition Land” column owned by the Plaintiffs (hereinafter “each land of this case”), and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the Defendant.

The Plaintiff’s land acquired by consultation (unit: 1.36,382,500 square meters on June 23, 2004 on June 23, 2004; 1,069 square meters on June 23, 2004; 78,571,500 square meters on October 25, 2004; 513,003 C 82, 82,003, 82, 97.6,000 on September 21, 204 on September 21, 2004; 204, 004, 0004, 0004, 0004, 56, 56,000 or 78.1,000 square meters on June 14, 2004; 208, 2008, 86,000 or 75,00 forest and fields on May 25, 2007

B. On September 21, 2006, the Minister of Construction and Transportation publicly announced the Ministry of Construction and Transportation on September 21, 2006 as “W Planning Zone and Housing Site Development Project” with respect to the said “W Planning Zone and Housing Site Development Project” with the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs public notice X of the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs on May 30, 2008, the Minister of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs approved the development plan for the development project of the SB Area and Housing Site Development Project (hereinafter “instant project”). The Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs officially announced on May 30, 2008, the said “W Planning Zone and Housing Site Development Project” with respect to the alteration of the designation of a district (the said “W Planning Zone and Housing Site Development Project” with the purport of the alteration of the operator.

3. The operator of the project in this case is the defendant.