logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2017.12.13 2017고단1854
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치상)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a CMW car.

1. On May 16, 2017, the Defendant violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Bodily Injury resulting from hazardous driving) driven the said vehicle while under the influence of alcohol level of 0.185% in blood transfusion on May 16, 2017 and driven the said vehicle along the two-lanes in front of the E hotel located in Jeju at the Jeju City, one lane in the vicinity of the Kama Hospital, along the Saun Park Sanon-park distance.

In such cases, drivers are prohibited from driving if normal driving is difficult due to the influence of drugs or alcohol, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents by safely proceeding with the driving prior to the war, such as checking the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and the right and duty of care are accurately

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in driving under the influence of alcohol while driving normally at the speed of the Defendant at the front of the driving vehicle of the victim F(53 Do) who is waiting for a signal signal at the front of the Defendant’s driving direction. The Defendant, as a consequence of the impact of drinking, got the back of the passenger vehicle of the Defendant’s GF(53 Do) driving in the front of the Defendant’s driving vehicle, and due to that impact, became the back-line of the traffic vehicle of H(60 Doe) operating in the signal waiting in the future while the said passenger vehicle is pushed up in the future. The Defendant also got the back-line of the traffic vehicle of the victim JV (35 Doe) driving in the atmosphere of the signal while being pushed up in the future.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s occupational negligence requires approximately two-day medical treatment to the above victim F, including fluoral salt fluor, which requires approximately two-day medical treatment to the victim J, the base base and tension of the fluoral in need of approximately two-day medical treatment to the victim L (2) who is K5 passengers, and any other fluoral influoring part of the bluoral in need of approximately two-day medical treatment to the victim M (6 years). The Defendant requires approximately two-month medical treatment to the same victim N (35 years old).

arrow