1. The plaintiffs who are related to the difference in the outstanding amount that the plaintiff A works as the defendant's business employee.

1. The parties concerned are companies whose purpose is to manufacture, process, sell ice cream, ice ice cream, and frozen food. Plaintiff A entered on September 6, 2010 and worked as business employees at the Defendant’s dong Branch from December 1, 2010 to July 6, 2015, sold to the customers the fruit produced by the Defendant in Gwangju Dong-dong, Heungdong, Heungdong, Pungdong, and Dosandong, and was in charge of the business of collecting the price. Plaintiff B is the Plaintiff’s mother and the fidelity guarantor, and there is no dispute between the parties concerned.

2. The assertion and judgment

A. On June 11, 2015, the Plaintiffs filed a claim for return of unjust enrichment with the Defendant KRW 2,00,000, KRW 15,000,000 on June 3, 2015, and KRW 3,600,000 on April 29, 2014, KRW 3,600,00 on January 29, 2014, KRW 4,600,000 on January 15, 2013, and KRW 8,00,00,000,000 on December 24, 2012, and KRW 17,200,000 on March 27, 2015, were forced to pay the difference between KRW 20,00 and KRW 53,400 on the market price of the Plaintiff’s goods sold at the price of 20,00,000 on March 27, 2012.

The amount of money deposited on June 11, 2015, out of the above money, the following 2-B:

As seen in the paragraph, it is valid to pay damages for the shortage of sales, and the remaining amount of payment is the fact that the plaintiff A is in the position of the business operator who is obligated to sell the defendant's products and deposit the sales proceeds.