logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원공주지원 2014.09.25 2013가단20884
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 52,977,910 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from September 28, 2013 to September 25, 2014.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From February 1, 2008 to August 21, 2013, the Defendant served as a business employee of the Plaintiff’s B’s business office and sold the fruits produced by the Plaintiff to the business partner and was in charge of the business of collecting the price.

B. The Plaintiff: (a) delayed reporting and concealment of reported non-performing loans; (b) occupational embezzlement and breach of trust; (c) actual sales and tax invoices; and (d) excessive discount execution [the sale at a price lower than the price (the company’s order price) calculated by type of transaction partners; hereinafter “dumping sale”); (5) voluntary advance execution (products, subsidies, etc.) prior to the approval of the decision-making report; (6) processing of the Enuriium Law/Supplementary Rule; (7) occurrence of virtual sales (referring to sales on books as if the sales were conducted by falsity, but not by the actual sales) are stipulated as “ordinary business conduct”; and (b) has business partners including the Defendant comply with it.

C. The Defendant, while working as a business member, engaged in trade arising from abnormal business activities prohibited by the Plaintiff in the above internal guidelines, including virtual sales and dumping sales, and entered products into a normal registration transaction office as if they were sold in accordance with the company instructions, and reported the details of sales and receipts to the Plaintiff.

On June 1, 2013, C, which was transferred to the head of the Plaintiff’s B business office, has settled the outstanding claims of the business members including the Defendant in the course of identifying the business, and in the process, it was found that there was difference between the Defendant’s computer-based outstanding claims and the actual outstanding claims.

C On July 31, 2013, a person who held that “the Defendant is a person who has not deposited KRW 35,619,276 while working as a business employee and has been useful facts” (No. 11) and the above money.

arrow