The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal was that the Defendant did not steals goods displayed within the Mat at the time and place stated in the facts charged of the instant case, and only warning was given due to the theft prevention gate, which was friendly on the Defendant’s bank.

2. According to the date and time indicated in the facts charged in the instant case, whether the Defendant stolen the goods displayed in the Mat at the place, the evidence duly adopted and examined by the lower court, and in particular, the evidence that the Defendant stolen the goods displayed therein, and that the Defendant was exposed to the security personnel by giving a warning.

(In addition, the defendant, while denying the facts charged in this case, is unable to make a reasonable statement as to which he owns the article in question. 3. Accordingly, the defendant's appeal is without merit. Therefore, it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.