1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 8, 2017, the Plaintiff and his father and wife visited the Defendant’s Hyeong Village (hereinafter “instant product”) to purchase 15 kinds of goods, such as cremation, the plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of the plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant of plant

B. After that, although the Plaintiff attempted to go out of the calculation unit, the Plaintiff sent a warning from the “Sullar” (a device that is installed near the exit of the ordinary calculation unit, which is a device that causes warning when the goods with the theft prevention unit are shipped out of the calculation unit, and the customer goes through the sound list and leaves out of the calculation unit).

On the other hand, on the side of the Ulves list, the notice stating that “I may immediately address the low-income members.” is attached to the front side of the Ulves list, “I will not see the warning even if the warning is sounding. I may not remove the prevention house.”

C. Accordingly, D, an employee of the Defendant, provided the Plaintiff with the guidance that “the Plaintiff may cause depreciation because the theft prevention house can not be removed,” and found that the theft prevention house was not removed from the goods of this case among the goods within the shopping car, and notified the Plaintiff thereof.

The Plaintiff demanded D to refund all of the above purchase goods, and returned to D after having been fully refunded at the customer satisfaction center in the B ordinary village, and later the Plaintiff’s wife visited the customer satisfaction center in the above ordinary village to re-purchase the returned goods.

E. Despite the absence of the Plaintiff’s theft of goods in a marina, the Plaintiff’s use of a theft alarm device would prevent shopping cart among many customers, confirm the goods without the Plaintiff’s consent, enter the instant goods into a high level, and put them on “this is.”