logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2021.02.09 2020고정2374
건조물침입
Text

The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

In the indictment of the victim B, the name of the victim is not indicated.

There is substantial disadvantage in exercising the defendant's right to defense.

Therefore, the name of the victim is added ex officio without going through the amendment process.

A person who is a door-to-door engineer that delivers the ordered goods.

On August 29, 2020, the Defendant invadedd against the will of the victim by opening and entering the 'D Beauty Room' operated by the injured party on the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government C and the first floor on August 29, 202.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (report on the results of field meals and attaching field photographs);

1. Relevant Article 319 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 59(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Sentence (see, e.g., the reasons for sentencing) is located on the first floor of the building where the joint entrance door, which is opened and closed, is installed by inputting the password.

When entering the above joint entrance, there was a question about the beauty art room in the common corridor, which was corrected, and there was a question about the back of the building without correction.

The defendant attempted to contact the victim for delivery, but the victim did not receive a telephone.

The defendant opened a cosmetic, which is not corrected after the back of the building, and entered the beauty room and kept the delivery goods.

Since then, the victim in contact with the defendant was informed of the identification number of the above joint inquiry to the defendant.

The defendant sent the following delivery goods to the joint corridor front of the door in the beauty room, which was corrected again by entering the beauty room of this case through the after door, within the beauty room. The above front door is re-locked.

arrow