logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 거창지원 2018.09.19 2018고단203
성폭력범죄의처벌등에관한특례법위반(공중밀집장소에서의추행)
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

[criminal record] On February 27, 2018, the Defendant was notified of a fine of two million won due to a violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Intrusion into Public Place for Sexual Purposes) in the Changwon District Court's branch on July 27, 2018. On July 27, 2018, the Defendant was not detained as a crime of violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes (Intrusion into Public Use Place for Sexual Purposes) in the Incheon District Court's branch branch on the Incheon District Court's branch on July 27, 2018, and was detained as a crime of intrusion upon residence with the Daejeon District Court's branch on July

[Criminal facts]

1. On May 21, 2018, from around 06:56 to around 08:10 on the same day, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim B: (a) discovered the victim B (n, 49 years of age) who is enjoying from the above 7th floor of “D Sariba” located in Bucheon-si C; and (b) write down the victim’s shoulder with the victim’s hand by putting the victim’s hand back to the back; (c) then, the victim was able to take part in the victim’s hand and her knife with the victim’s hand. In other words, the victim was able to use the victim’s knife by taking part in his knife as his knife, and then write the victim’s shoulder by taking part in his knife as his knife.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim in a densely concentrated place.

2. On May 21, 2018, the Defendant discovered a victim with no name at the same place as before and after May 21, 2018, and carried out the victim’s losses by taking advantage of the discovery of a victim with no name at the same place as before and after the occurrence of the crime.

Accordingly, the defendant committed an indecent act against the victim in a densely concentrated place.

According to the records of this case, the defendant was found to have died on August 3, 2018, which was prior to the prosecution of this case, and thus, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327(2) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow