logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 통영지원 2015.05.27 2015고단144
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. Around December 21, 2014, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act and the Road Traffic Act (driving without a license) driven a Clearning car under the influence of alcohol by 0.108% without obtaining a driver’s license on a section of about 50 meters in front of a 50-meter ambed restaurant at Sacheon-si, Sacheon-si to the road located in the same Eup-do ambro-ro in the same Eup-do.

2. On December 21, 2014, the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act: (a) was discovered before the Yancheon-si Macheon-si Macheon-si Macheon-si Macheon-si Macheon-si Ga, and did not possess the driver’s license and identification card, and (b) did not carry the driver’s license and identification card; (c) instead, the Defendant used another person’s resident registration number as if he was his resident registration number, and instead used another person’s resident registration number.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (2), issued the Defendant’s type E resident registration number at the same time and place, and signed the Defendant’s signature in the column for the driver’s signature of the above notification by means of placing the Defendant’s personal information on PDA for drinking control, upon D police officers’ request for signature after preparing a “Notification of the Result of Drinking Operation Control” with the Defendant’s personal information on PDA type E for drinking control.

In addition, the Defendant again signed the “Report on the Statement of the State Drivers,” “written confirmation,” and “written revocation statement,” prepared by D while driving as if he was E, and marked his hand.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising the right, the Defendant forged the signature of the other party by stating the name E in the “Notification of the Results of the Sound Driving Control Act”, “Report on the Statement of Plow Drivers,” “written confirmation,” and “written revocation statement,” respectively.

4. Paragraph 3. The defendant at the time and place specified in Paragraph 2 is not aware of the forgery.

arrow