logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 12. 07. 선고 2017두57653 판결
(심리불속행) 부동산임대소득이 결손인 과세기간에 필요경비로 산입된 감가상각비를 양도소득세의 취득가액에서 차감할 수 없음[일부국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-76697 (2017.06)

Case Number of the previous trial

Seocho 2015 Schedules232 (Law No. 135, 28 July 2015)

Title

(C) The real estate rental income shall not be deducted from the acquisition value of the transfer income tax, the depreciation costs included in the necessary expenses in the taxable period, which is a deficit.

Summary

(C) If a real estate rental income cannot be deducted from the acquisition value of the transfer income tax in the taxable period in which the real estate rental income is included in the necessary expenses, it cannot be viewed as infringing on the constitutional property right or violating the principle of no taxation without the law, and

Related statutes

Article 97 (Calculation of Necessary Expenses for Transfer Income)

Cases

2017Du57653 Revocation of Disposition of Imposing capital gains tax

Plaintiff-Appellant

-Appellee

OO

Defendant-Appellee

Appellant

◊◊세무서장

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2016Nu76697 Decided July 6, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

December 7, 2017

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the appellant's grounds of appeal fall under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, all of the appeals are dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow