Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

At around 01:30 on September 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) was asked to explain the circumstances of the instant case from the police official F, who was called “D hotel” on the front of “D hotel” in Seocho-si; (b) the Defendant was asked to explain the circumstances of the instant case from the police official F, the Seocho-gu Police Station E-gu Police Station, the police official affiliated with the E-gu Police Station, for whom the Defendant was called on September 12, 2017, and (c) was 2:3 times, and was 2:3 times, and was 3: (a) the Defendant was her police officer, and was her responsibility, and (b) the Defendant was her fright at the floor of the instant F, the Defendant was frighted on the top of the instant son’s face, with the background of the instant case being frightd on the top of the said son’s body.

At around 01:45 on the same day, the Defendant continued to be arrested as a current offender through G, etc., a police officer assigned to the same police officer, due to the foregoing act at the above location, and the Defendant was arrested as a current offender to interfere with the performance of official duties by G, etc., and the Defendant was able to take the Defendant into the lower seat of the patrol police officer to take the said Embrial office, and taken the Defendant into the back seat of the patrol police officer, and the Defendant “W,” the Defendant

A. The said police officer assaulted his body, knife, knife, knife, etc. of G with his body knife, knife.

As a result, the above police officers' 112 reported cases and the arrest of flagrant offenders have fulfilled their legitimate duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Application of the Defendant’s legal statement H, I’s statement of reference witness F, G’s victim’s statement-related Acts and subordinate statutes to the case pictures;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes Act - Assaults and intimidation against criminal facts in the judgment are conducted at the same place as the same opportunity and are assessed as one act under social norms. Thus, interference with the execution of official duties in the judgment is a conceptual concurrence.