logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2014.01.10 2013고단1564
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 17, 2013, at around 10:50 on September 17, 2013, the Defendant: (a) confirmed that he was in the house of the victim B located in Jeju-si, and intruded into the house through a door door door that was not locked; and (b) subsequently, he stolen the victim’s wall that contains one cash 10,000 won, five USD 10,000,000,000,000 won, credit card, identification card, etc. on the deposit of the ward.

2. On June 201, at around 15:00 on the first day of June 201, the Defendant intruded into the victim D with an unlocked gate by taking advantage of the gaps in which the surrounding surveillance was neglected, and then thefted by having one cash 20,000 won on the floor of the victim, with a single 50,000 won (50,000 won) at the victim’s market price in which the victim’s identity card, etc. was included.

3. On June 2012, the Defendant: (a) opened an unlocked gate and intruded into the house of the Victim F in Jeju-si, at around 14:00 on the first day of June 2012, the Defendant committed a crime against the Victim F (a personal intrusion, theft) and committed an attempted crime, by using the gap in which the surrounding surveillance was neglected; (b) opened the gate by using the gap in which the surrounding surveillance was neglected; and (c) duplicating the stolen object but did not find it.

4. The Defendant committed a crime against the victim H (a person who intrudes upon his/her residence, theft, and attempted larceny) on April 1, 2013, at around 13:00 on the first day of the order of the victim H in Jeju Island, and opened a locked gate and intruded into the house of the victim H located in Jeju City by using a cresh in which the surrounding surveillance was neglected, and then did not find any stolen object but did not commit an attempted crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Written statements in F, H, and D;

1. Application of ctvable Track photographs and field inspection photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions and choice of punishment concerning facts constituting an offense: Imprisonment with prison labor under Articles 319 (1), 329, 342, and 329 of the Criminal Act;

1. Concurrent Crimes.

arrow