logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.09.25 2015고단2667
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Intrusion upon residence and theft;

A. In July 2014, the Defendant: (a) from around 14:00 on the first day of July 2014 to around 15:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (b) went into the house of the victim D in Daejeon Seo-gu, Daejeon; (c) went into the house of the victim D; (d) went into the unlocked gate; and (e) opened a door to the unlocked gate; and (e) went into the door, and stolen the cash of KRW 30,000 on the part of the victim’s on the wall inside the west gate; and (e) cut into the door with the seal of KRW 30,00 on the part of the victim’s possession.

B. The Defendant committed during April 2015, from April 15 to April 16:00 on the first day of April 2015, at around 16:00 on the same day, went into the house of Victim F, which was located in Daejeon Seo-gu E, Daejeon. The Defendant opened and intruded into a locked visit in the same manner as the above paragraph (a), and 200,000 won in cash located below the floor electric board at that place.

C. From May 15 to 16:00 on the first day of May 2015, the Defendant committed the crime, the Defendant: (a) from around 15:00 on the first day to around 16:00 on the same day, opened and intruded into the Victim H’s House G in Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongbuk-gun; (b) opened and intruded into the victim’s house in the same manner as the above paragraph (a); and (c) took one cash 300,000 won on the part of the victim suffering from the wall, from which he was the victim’s wall, and cut off with one wall 200,000 won on the part of the victim’s house.

2. On August 3, 2015, around 17:50 on August 3, 2015, the Defendant: (a) opened an unlocked visit and intruded into the house by the victimJ located in Daejeon Dong-gu, Daejeon; and (b) opened and intruded into the house by means of the above 1-A; (c) opened and tamping the tamper, but did not carry out an attempted crime because there was no stolen object.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of K and L;

1. Application of each statute of M, N, orO;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

arrow