logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2019.10.11 2019고단790
상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 30, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 16:30 on May 30, 2019, on the ground that the victim D (the age of 43) who is a staff member of the above apartment apartment management office in the Gun, left her room for the fire-fighting inspection of apartment houses for about 8 months before the 10 months ago, the Defendant brought about the victim's face at around 10 times with the main food and hand room for the victim's face, and caused the victim's damage of the face that requires approximately 14 days' treatment, and the inside and outside of the inside of the mouth, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of investigation reports (related to confirmation of the fact of damage), investigation reports (related to data submitted by a victim), and statutes;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Probation and Social Service Order is that the defendant committed an injury requiring medical treatment for 14 days by assaulting the apartment management office's employees belonging to an elevator during the period of eight months prior to the occurrence of the injury, in light of the motive, method, circumstance, etc. of the crime, which is highly likely to be subject to criticism in light of the motive, method, circumstance, etc. of the crime. Nevertheless, it is recognized that the defendant was unable to agree with the victim or to be used from the victim, and that the defendant was punished for the same crime, but it seems that the defendant suffered from stimulative disorder, etc., but it seems that it is more appropriate to order the probation rather than the sentence imposed on the defendant for the prevention of re-offending, to have the mental diagnosis and treatment faithfully during the period of probation, rather than having been sentenced to the sentence imposed on the defendant. The degree of the injury suffered by the victim is not much serious, the defendant's age

arrow