Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, from the date of the final judgment of this case, each of the above two years against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 17, 2015, Defendant A, at the parking lot for “Wang-do doctoral Dol,” located in the Dong-gun, Young-gun, Young-gun’s in the Dong-gu, Young-gun’s written book, Defendant A, on the ground that he she sawd from the victim B ( South and 51 years of age), he was a dangerous object that was prepared in advance during the dispute with the victim on the ground that he she sawd from the victim B (the other person between South and 51 years of age), followed up two dives of the victim’s head, body, etc. (the total length of 60cm) in order for the victim to take approximately two weeks’s head, body, etc.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

2. Defendant B, at the same time, at the same place as the above paragraph 1, suffered from the victim A ( South Korea, 48 years of age) and at the same time and place as above, deducted the victim from the victim the above wood autopsy, and caused injury to the victim by taking the victim’s head and the body of the victim’s head and the body of the body, which is the dangerous object, when taking the body of the victim’s head and the body of the body of the body, etc., for about eight weeks of treatment.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (with respect to a neck used as a deadly weapon), a report on investigation (Attachment of B bodily injury certificate), and a report on investigation (Attachment of A bodily injury certificate);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code for the observation of protection and community service order is that all the Defendants were punished several times due to violent crimes, but there is a high possibility of criticism in that they again committed the instant crime.

In addition, in that Defendant A was possessed with a neck, which is a dangerous object, and came to commit a crime by using it, Defendant B is very heavy in that Defendant B used the above neck with a scambling and causing considerable injury to Defendant A.

However, the Defendants’ instant case.