logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고단2112
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)등
Text

Defendant

B A person shall be punished by imprisonment of one year and two months.

However, with respect to Defendant B, the above punishment shall be imposed for three years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Defendant B] On August 14, 2013, Defendant B was sentenced to one year and eight months of imprisonment and three years of suspended execution, and the judgment became final and conclusive on January 4, 2014, for violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a group, deadly weapon, etc.) at the Jung-gu District Court.

[Criminal Facts]

1. On July 15, 2012, from around 01:00 to around 06:00 to around 06:00, Defendant B and E heard the speech that female employees who had been the Defendant in mind were faced with the victim G (a person living together with the female) who had been living together with the Defendant B, and the Defendant B informed Defendant B of the place where the Defendant was the victim, and notified Defendant B of the place where the victim was located, and the Defendant B puts the victim’s body at the mon of wooden material, which is a dangerous object in the surrounding area, and caused the victim’s injury to the victim’s mental health, thereby getting the victim’s treatment.

As a result, Defendant B conspired with E and carried dangerous objects and inflicted injury on others.

2. As long as not guilty of a person who was prosecuted as an accomplice under the name of a person who was not killed in the name of the deceased, the court found that the person conspired with the “nameless person”.

The joint crime committed by Defendant B and the instigious victims from March 22, 2011 to around 10:00, in the first 2 room located in Namyang-si, Nam-si, and the name instigious victims were sufficiently divided on the ground that female employees of the above business establishment do not get so-called “second mar.” The above employees expressed desire to the victim J (Ga name) and K (Ga name) who are employees of the above business establishment, and expressed their face to the victim’s face on their hand, and continued to undergo the autopsy from Defendant B, and using this, the victims’ body was examined by the victim’s body. The Defendant B brought the mar, which is a dangerous object to the instigious victims, as seen above, brought about the mark, and considered it out of the outside, brought about about about two weeks of medical treatment.

In this respect, the defendant and the non-resident of the name of the defendant are jointly dangerous objects.

arrow