Defendant

A Imprisonment for two years, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 3,00,000 won.

Defendant

B The above fine shall not be paid.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

On November 20, 2013, A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year due to night intrusion, larceny, etc. at the Busan District Court's branch court, and the decision was finalized on November 28, 2013.

1. On September 14, 2015, at around 100, Defendant A’s habitual theft and intrusion on structures: (a) went into the public stairs of the highest floor on board the elevator through the apartment entrance at around 102, 102, around the lower order of 14:0,00, and then, (b) the victim, who was installed before the fire-fighting of each floor at the same place, gets out of the stairs and was in possession of the residents of the above apartment, (c) 7 fire-fighting gates in the aggregate of KRW 126,00 in the market price of the above apartment, which is owned by the residents of the above apartment; and (d) cut off the 1,615 fire-fighting gates in total at around 110,00, total market price, such as the list of crimes in the attached Form.

2. Defendant B’s chief secretary in charge of the affairs is a person who is engaged in the sales of stolen goods under the trade name of “G” from Busan City Shipping Daegu.

On September 17, 2015, the Defendant purchased 7 fire fighting fighting gates equivalent to KRW 126,000 at the market price, which is the ownership of the victim E apartment residents who he stolen from A in the above secondhand on the water around 17:00.

In such cases, although the defendant, who is engaged in the water sales business, has a duty of care to verify whether he/she is stolen by ascertaining the personal information of A, while taking the process of acquiring fire fighting spons and demanding prices suitable for the motive of sale and transaction prices, etc., he/she purchased 2,800 won per kilogram per 110 times in total from around that time to May 2016, by neglecting the above duty of care and neglecting the judgment on the stolen water by neglecting the judgment on the stolen water.

Ultimately, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by occupational negligence as above.

b)a summary of the evidence;