The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant is running the business of developing Pyeongtaek-si F Multi-Family Housing (hereinafter “instant Pyeongtaek-si business”) at the office (ju) office in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul around February 2008, and E is running the business of developing Pyeongtaek-si F Multi-Family Housing (hereinafter “instant business”). To conclude this, KRW 400 million is needed.

The principal of the investment can be repaid with a loan within 3 to 4 months, and when the project is determined, the profit will be KRW 1 billion.

“A false statement,” and the above E sent the Defendant’s proposal to the Victim G.

However, in fact, the Defendant applied for the approval of the instant business to Pyeongtaek-si at the time, but failed to meet some of the requirements, and eventually, the application for the approval of the business was returned from Pyeongtaek-si on May 1, 2008. The Defendant applied for the loan to the Korean mutual savings bank, but was in an uncertain state where the loan can be carried out immediately.

In addition, on January 18, 2008, the Defendant issued and extended the due date for the check ( check number: I) with a face value of 2 billion won per face value as collateral for H’s obligation. Ultimately, the Defendant issued and failed to pay the unpaid check on May 30, 2008, ② the check number with a face value of 400 million won per face value per face value per February 31, 2008. Ultimately, the Defendant did not pay the unpaid check on March 31, 2009, ③ the check amount with a face value of 1 billion won per face value per face value ( check number: K) with a loan of 1 billion won per face value around March 5, 2010, and the Defendant did not use the loan of 1 billion won as collateral for the development project and did not use the loan of 7 billion won per face value as collateral and did not use the loan of 1 billion won per face value as collateral for the development project.

Defendant 2.