logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2016.02.16 2015고단395
부정수표단속법위반
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is a person who operates a household agency in Y in the name of Jeonju-si, Jeonju-si.

On June 21, 1999, the Defendant entered into a contract to establish a current account with a national bank's automatic branch office and has traded checks.

(1) The Defendant issued one check number F, eight million won at a 20-round or around August 2014; the date of issuance; and one check under C on December 31, 2014; and the payment was presented to the Bank by the holder G on December 31, 2014; but the payment was not due to the suspension of transaction; (2) one check number H or nine million won at a 20-round or around September 2014; and (3) one check is issued at a 1-round 20-round or below the date of issuance; and (4) the payment was presented at a 1-round or above 5-round 1-round 20-round 1-round 20-round 20-round 1-6-on 1-on 3-on 20-on 1-on 1-on 3-on 1-on 3-on 1-on 1-on 1-on 3-on 1-on 3-on 1-on 20.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are determined.

arrow