(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.02.14 2017고단8394

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 수원지방법원 2020.02.14 2017고단8394

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Highest 8394"

1. Around August 2016, the Defendant forged a labor contract and exercised the contract form in the name of “C” with the seal affixed by the Defendant in the name of “C” and the seal affixed by the Defendant at his/her own discretion in the name above the above name, and then forged one copy of the contract form in the name of “C”, which is composed of the contract term 2 years, occupational categories management positions, wage amounting to 4.5 million won at the construction site office of “C labor contract” in “C”, which is composed of the contract term 4.5 million won per month.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant forged and exercised one copy of the labor contract in the name of the KCAC, which is a private document related to rights and duties.

2. Around August 11, 2016, the Defendant: (a) stated in the “Lessee (B)” column of the temporary re-lease agreement in the “Lessee”; (b) “B”; and (c) “2) contract period” column in the “B” column in the “B” column of the said temporary re-lease agreement; and (d) “3. payment method and conditions” column in the “25th of the following month after the end of each month; (b) payment in cash within 15th of the following month; and (c) “Lessee (B)” column in the “location” column of the said temporary re-lease agreement; (b) stated that the Defendant arbitrarily possessed the name of the “C” and “B” column in the “SA” column of the said temporary re-lease agreement; and (c) stated that he/she had the name of the “C” and “B” in the “name” column of the “SA” and issued the name and seal of the “EA” in his/her name he/she had in his/she.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the defendant has forged and exercised one copy of the temporary re-lease agreement in the name of the KCAC, which is a private document concerning rights and obligations.

3. The Defendant’s fraud is at the above site office around August 11, 2016.

유사 판례

-서울동부지방법원 2014.02.06 2012고단2082 (1)

-서울남부지방법원 2020.08.26 2020고정967

-수원지방법원 여주지원 2014.05.26 2014고정84

-청주지방법원 2014.03.27 2014고정89

-수원지방법원 안산지원 2016.01.14 2015고단3244