A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is an employee of the Dispute Resolution D who constructed the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government apartment complex, and the victim Dispute Resolution E is the owner of the above apartment complex.

A. On March 15, 2017, at around 19:54, the Defendant destroyed the above C apartment, such as melting the black camera on CCTV installed in LVV base, and scambling on the inside wall of the elevator as “the right of retention,” “the possession,” which is “the possession,” etc.

B. On March 21, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the place above 03:0 on March 21, 2017; (b) on the outer wall of the elevator 1’s upper floor, the Defendant written the fall as soon as possible on the wall of the elevator 1’s upper floor; and (c) on the outside glass window of the first floor, the Defendant, as soon as possible, damaged the Defendant’s “in the exercise of possessory right”; and (d) the Mactrine of the damage caused by the possession of the contractor’s possession site, etc.

(c)

On March 27, 2017, around 01:44, the Defendant destroyed and damaged the instant place, i.e., the “site of the possession of a trial project” and “alternatives” at the free shop of the first floor of the commercial building.

(d)

On April 14, 2017, the Defendant damaged the elevator at the above location on April 14, 2017, such as fast fluoring the color car into six parts of CCTV installed inside the elevator inside and outside the elevator at the above location.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property so that the repair cost equivalent to 59 million won in total was damaged four times.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with respect to F;

1. Each photograph and written estimate;

1. A criminal investigation report (CCTV verification);

1. The application of each Act and subordinate statutes to CCTV video CDs in each elevator;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Taking account of the following factors: (a) there is a dispute in relation to the amount and payment of the construction price between E and the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, Article 50, Article 50, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act; (b) and (c) there are some circumstances that may be somewhat taken into account in calculating the amount of damage caused by property damage.