logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2015.01.28 2014고정1560
건조물침입등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the representative of the State F, who is the contractor of the E-House Housing outside the Republic of Korea, and the victim (State) land trust is the trust company for the E-House and its site.

G took over the status of a truster under the trust contract between Korea and H, the owner of the building, and the status of a beneficiary from the defendant, respectively, and the victim I was delegated by the above G with the status of a beneficiary and the management authority of the aforesaid E-Building Housing.

1. On January 10, 2014, the Defendant: (a) at the entrance of the said E-Jed Housing at the first parking lot managed by the victims, immediately fallen from the entrance of the parking lot and the wall of the said E-Jed Housing; (b) on the wall of the parking lot, the Defendant: (c) on the wall of the guard room, “in the course of exercising the right of retention” and “the right of retention” on the wall of the guard room; and (d) continued to fall as soon as possible on the wall of the above E-Jed Housing 2, 3, and 6 parking lots, respectively.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victims' property to repair.

2. The same defendant;

2. On the wall of each of the above Eud Housing No. 1, 1, 2, 3, and 6 parking lots, the instant Eudio 18. Scam Scam Scam on the wall of each of the above Eudio 202 parking lots, and continuously, on the entrance door of the above 2, 202 entrance, the “right of retention” and the elevator wall of the elevator No. 202 as “co-operation in construction work at the lien site.”

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victims' property to repair.

3. The defendant has committed the same harm.

2. On 20. 20. 20. 20. Each of the above E-building units 1, 1, 2, 3, and 6 parking lots, the wall of each of the above E-building units 1, 2, 3, and 6, the “outward access” was cut off

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victims' property to repair.

4. On February 20, 2014, the Defendant, at the time of the 2nd 2nd 204 East E-House, managed by the victims, opened the entrance by an irregular means without the consent of the victims.

arrow