logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 1984. 3. 13. 선고 83도3105 판결
[폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반][공1984.5.1.(727),665]
Main Issues

The meaning of Article 3 (1) [the preceding Article] or 3 (1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act

Summary of Judgment

Article 3 (1) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act [the crime under the preceding Article] or 3 (1) of the same Act [the crime] or 2 (1) of the same Act refers only to [the crime under each Article of the Criminal Act], and Article 2 (1) of the same Act cannot be deemed to refer only to the crime under Article 2 (1) of the same Act [Habitual Offenders] or 2 (2) of the same Act.

[Reference Provisions]

Articles 3(1), 2(1), and 2(2) of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act

Escopics

Defendant 1 and one other

upper and high-ranking persons

Defendants

Defense Counsel

Attorney Shin Shin-chul

Judgment of the lower court

Jeonju District Court Decision 83No462 delivered on November 9, 1983

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

The number of days pending trial after the appeal shall be 70 days each to be included in the corresponding principal sentence.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal by the Defendants and the defense counsel are also examined.

Examining the evidence cited by the judgment of the court of first instance as cited by the court below after comparing the records, it appears that the court below's measures that recognized the facts of the crime in the judgment of the court of first instance were justifiable, and it cannot be said that there was an error of misconception of the facts by misunderstanding the rules of evidence, and the court below erred by misapprehending the legal principles as to the above facts of crime, and Article 3 (1) of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act / [the crime under the preceding Article] or / [the crime] of Article 2 (1) / [each Article of the Criminal Act] and Article 2 (1) / [the crime under Article 2 (1) / [Habitual offender] or Paragraph (2) / [the crime under Article 3 (1) / [the crime under the preceding Article] or 3 (1) / [the crime] of Article 2 (1) / [the crime] cannot be accepted in the premise that it is a habitual offender / [the crime under Article 2 (1) / [the crime] of this case].

Therefore, all appeals are dismissed, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating judges by applying Article 57 of the Criminal Act and Article 24 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Promotion, etc. of Legal Proceedings.

Justices Kim Jung-soo (Presiding Justice) and Lee Jong-young's Lee Jong-young

arrow