A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. On September 11, 2012, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (free license, drinking driving), without obtaining a driver’s license, while under the influence of alcohol 0.060%, around 23:23:0 on September 11, 2012, the Defendant driven a C 20 kilometer truck from the Gangnam-gu Seoul Sejongdong to the front street in front of the Seoul except Seoul Highway interest rate.

2. The Defendant: (a) was driving the foregoing cargo vehicle in front of the interest station in the interest station in the Seoul Southern Expressway at a time and at the same time; (b) was required by the Incheon Regional Police Agency guard and the Police Station Assistant Inspector D to affix his/her signature on the actual condition report, suspension statement, and confirmation letter of recovery of the driver’s license; (c) without authority, the above driver’s circumstantial report, suspension statement, and the name column of the Defendant’s letter of confirmation to collect the driver’s license; and (d) written the Defendant’s name in the name column of the letter of confirmation to collect the driver’s license; and (e) forged the above driver’s statement, suspension statement, and the Non-exclusive certificate to collect the driver’s license; and (e) submitted it to the above D, which is a private document, without authority, and exercised it.

3. On September 22, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the office of the Silung Police Station in the Silung-dong 340 Silung-dong, Silung-dong, Silung-dong, the Defendant was investigated as a suspect by driving drinking and unlicensed driving; and (b) at the office of the transportation investigation team, the Defendant signed the name of E for the purpose of demanding the submission of a signature to affix a seal on the interrogation protocol; (c) forged the above E’s private signature; and (d) submitted the above interrogation protocol to the said F without any authority to do so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol under E;

1. Polices with regard to G and D.