logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2013.07.12 2013노1034
명예훼손
Text

The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. From April 1, 2011 to August 16, 2011, the Defendant is a person who works as the president of the above apartment council from May 1, 201 to July 6, 2012, the head of the office of apartment management in Bupyeong-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and D’s eight Dong representative of the above apartment from May 1, 201 to July 6, 2012. The Defendant attended the above apartment representative meeting from May 1, 2011 to the above apartment council of occupants’ representatives from May 1, 201 to the above apartment council of occupants’ representatives. The Defendant’s written estimates presented by the company as “G” to D who wishes to notify the residents of the wrongful conduct of the victim, and the written estimates presented by the company was found to have been submitted to the head of the above office of occupants’ representatives, and it was possible to accept the written estimates for correction, such as the written estimates for correction from the chairman of the company.

However, there was no fact that the victim had the CCTV company correct the quotation by making it possible for the victim to write down the quotation in a million won, and the defendant was well aware that there was no fact that the victim did not make an estimate.

Accordingly, the defendant and D damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

B. On October 31, 201, the Defendant alone committed the Defendant’s single crime, following the attendance at the special meeting place for the occupants’ representatives of the instant apartment at the meeting room of the said council of occupants’ representatives, and the title “ogles with a thickness of the representative occupants.”

arrow