logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 06. 29. 선고 2017다224173 판결
(심리불속행)[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court-2016-Na13770 ( April 05, 2017)

Title

(Resceptic Conduct)

Summary

(Summary of the Judgment of the Supreme Court) Since there exists a claim for construction price against the delinquent taxpayer, the defendant shall pay the debt collection to the plaintiff in advance, and the co-litigants are liable to pay attached claims.

Related statutes

Article 248 of the Civil Execution Act

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined. However, the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant is recognized as not constituting grounds under each subparagraph of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure for Appeal. All of the appeals are dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow