1. The Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) paid KRW 152,258,467 to the Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) and its related amount from January 29, 201 to December 13, 2013.

In light of the above legal principles, the court below's judgment is justified, and the court below's decision is justified. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench, except for the changed construction of the PE Sam Among the defective construction of the 14 office dynamics, the part of the part as described below (No. 6) of the part as described below, in the design drawings or site descriptions, is without merit, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench. In so doing, it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench, except as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal, except as otherwise alleged in the ground of appeal.

[Attachment 6] The defendant's assertion that the part of "factory roof (SG6) 200*6t 40*200*6t 2nd 3 factory electric 2nd 2nd 1st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st st 2)

As a result of the additional appraisal by G, the Defendant asserts that the part of “the performance of the modification of good quality materials” should be evaluated as a separate defect.