1. The judgment of the first instance, including the participation of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenors in the trial, in each succession, is as follows:

(2) At the time of conclusion of the instant contract, the Plaintiff determined the construction cost based on the revised quotation (Evidence No. 4-2) rather than the design drawings (Evidence No. 5) at the time of execution of the instant contract, on the following grounds: (a) the Plaintiff did not make sure that the construction work was 50,937,529 529,271 67, 1254,519 81,731,670, 189 189,540,667 (b) as the result of the instant construction work 50,97,529 24,271 6,271 6, 1254,277, 300, 300, 300,000,000 10,0000,000,000 10,000,000,000 per piece 6,01,00

③ An appraiser C of a trial of a party shall not be THK160 sprinkl specified in the design drawings, but THK 175.