logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2019.09.27 2016가합100834 (1)
손해배상(건)
Text

1. The defendant Korea Land and Housing Corporation shall pay to the plaintiff KRW 3,987,590,145 and any of them

(a) For 3,205,103,189 won, March 2016

Reasons

The Defendants asserted that the defect in the “Items” as indicated below should be excluded from the defect as indicated below or the cost of repairing the defect should be reduced. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of the instant appraisal, the determination on the above is as indicated below.

(1) Defendant B asserts that the defect is not his own responsibility and asserts that it is not the responsibility of Defendant B’s liability, and as seen thereafter, the relevant argument is not separately examined in relation to the Plaintiff. In addition, Defendant B’s assertion that the defect is not acceptable, but is not a separate examination to the extent that it claims common with the Defendant Corporation. The summary of the claim in the claim in the claim in the item is determined [Attachment 12] [Attachment 12] Non-construction [Attachment 27] Non-construction with concrete water received from the lower floor bottom bottom of the roof floor (CONC block) [Attachment 43] Non-construction [Attachment 43] with double-watering parts of the underground parking lot wall (CONC block) walls (CONC block) and Non-construction [Attachment 10*10] [Attachment 43], but the standard non-construction drawings have to be stated differently from the standard construction drawings, but the standard construction drawings have not been stated in the standard construction drawings.

[Attachment : Defect : Recognition of Defects] Although the applicable sign was not stated in the approved drawings, since the sign in the standard detailed map appears to be a general construction method, it shall be constructed in accordance with the standard detailed shop drawings, and such construction is deemed to be essential for the function and it is difficult to view that the appraisal result of the appraiser judged to be unreasonable remarkably.

[Exting 67] The defects in this part of the stud of the floor of the parking lot (e.g., the stud/s, etc.) shall not be deemed to have occurred due to continuous vehicle operation, and shall not be deemed to have occurred within the period of security (1 year).

rejection: Defect.

arrow