The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six years.

The information on the accused shall be disclosed for a period of five years;

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The Defendant and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) to whom the Defendant and the person who requested the attachment order (hereinafter “Defendant”) were sentenced to the lower court’s punishment (a prison term of seven years, etc.”) are too unreasonable.

B. The prosecutor (unfair sentencing)’s sentence is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The crime of this case on the defendant's case was committed by threatening the defendant's life at night as he had a knife knife with the victim's age at the site of this case, and the defendant's withdrawal of money by force is very poor in light of the circumstances, etc., and the victim was raped in such opportunity. At the time of this case, the victim was suffering from school uniform, and thus, the victim is highly likely to be subject to criticism by being aware that the victim was a student, and the crime of this case seems to have suffered considerable sexual humiliation and mental suffering, and the defendant is presumed to have received considerable sexual humiliation and mental suffering, and the defendant did not receive a letter from the victim, and the defendant committed a crime similar to this case in the past, and even if he had been sentenced for a maximum of seven years, a short term of five years, which led to the crime of this case is disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, the Defendant made a confession of his mistake and divided into a truth, and the robbery of the Defendant is committed with the attempted attempted crime, and the Defendant is relatively clear of social ties with the neighboring people and his family members want to grow up with the Defendant’s preference. The crime of this case is in the relation of forced indecent act for which judgment has become final and conclusive and the crime of this case is one of the concurrent crimes after Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and thus, it is favorable for the Defendant to take into account the equity between the case where judgment is given.

In addition, in full view of the various circumstances, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, relationship with the victim, motive or circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the punishment sentenced by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, it is true.