The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence imposed by the lower court on the Defendant (one and half years of imprisonment, three years of suspended execution, and 80 hours of community service order) is too uneased and unreasonable.

2. The crime of this case is an unfavorable circumstance to the defendant, on the ground that the defendant had paid excessive amounts after drinking alcohol at the singing room where the victim had been on the part of the victim, and then again found in the singing room the victim again, and led the victim to the attempted withdrawal of money by threatening the victim with a knife, and the nature of the crime and method of committing the crime is very poor, and the defendant did not agree with the victim and the victim want to punish the defendant.

On the other hand, the fact that the defendant fully recognized the crime of this case and reflected his mistake, that the crime of this case is committed against the attempted crime, that the defendant threatened the victim with food knife, put it above the singing room, and enter the room room according to the victim's instruction, etc., and continued not to threaten the victim, and that the defendant has no other criminal records except for the punishment of a fine imposed once on the violation of the Road Traffic Act for a long time.

위와 같은 사정들과 그 밖에 피고인의 나이, 성 행, 환경, 범행의 동기, 수단과 결과, 범행 후의 정황 등 변론에 나타난 모든 양형조건 ◈ 법률상 처단형의 범위: 징역 1년 3월 ~ 7년 6월 ◈ 양형기준의 미적용: 특수강도 미수죄는 미수범죄이므로 양형기준이 적용되지 않음 , 제 1 심과 비교하여 양형의 조건에 변화가 없고 제 1 심의 양형이 재량의 합리적인 범위를 벗어나지 아니하는 경우에는 이를 존중함이 타당한 점( 대법원 2015. 7. 23. 선고 2015도 3260 전원 합의체 판결 참조) 등을 종합해 보면, 원심이 피고인에게 선고한 형이 너무 가벼워서 부당 하다고 할 수 없다.

Therefore, the prosecutor's argument of sentencing is justified.