logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.06.01 2016고단585
공무집행방해
Text

Defendants shall be punished by each fine of KRW 5,000,000.

The Defendants did not pay the above fines.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendants: (a) around November 7, 2015, the Defendants: “D” in the Yangju-si Co., Ltd. in Yangju-si; and (b) the Defendants: (c) the police officers of the Yangju-si Police Station E (a police box) called the Defendants to check the facts to the Defendants; and (d) the Defendants: (c) the police officers of the Yangju Police Station Epia, a police officer called the Defendants upon receiving 112 reports on the issues of the disturbance, such as smoking and drinking coffee; (d)

“A year has been reported” and “a year has been reported;

We are not erroneous, and we do not see why we do so.

“Abscison,” the police officer continued to stop patrols, and assaulted by hand, such as cutting down the body of the police officer and sponing the body of the police officer.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to interfere with the performance of official duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Each statement of G and H;

1. The Defendants asserts to the effect that they were physically and mentally disabled, such as the breath and breath of alcohol at the time of the instant crime.

According to the records, even though the Defendants were under the influence of alcohol at the time of committing the instant crime, in light of the circumstances leading to the instant crime, the details of the crime, the Defendants’ attitude, and the circumstances before and after the instant crime, it is not recognized that the Defendants did not have the ability to discern things or make decisions due to drinking, or that they did not have the ability to make decisions.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 30 of the Criminal Act regarding the relevant criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act for the attraction of a workhouse;

1. In order to establish a national legal order with the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act and eradicate the light of the public authority, it is necessary to strictly punish an offense against public authority, such as obstruction of performance of official duties, etc.

However, the defendants recognized their mistake and depth.

arrow