logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.07.04 2013가합41908
임금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 11,482,122 and KRW 10,367,968 among the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s KRW 10,367,968 shall be KRW 1,114,154.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. (1) The Defendant is affiliated with B University, and B University was established by combining C University and D University around July 1996.

(2) A public official in the technical service alone employed a staff member of the Korea Development Bank separately from the category of security service due to lack of security service personnel. On October 15, 191, the Plaintiff was appointed as a Class 5 security guard of the Korea Development Bank as of October 15, 1991, and was on duty as a night guard for about 21 years until December 31, 2012, and was retired from office.

(B) At the time of retirement, he was paid the salary of class 7 19.

The plaintiff's work form, etc. (1) B University has employed the staff of the main and night security service in charge of the public officials in technical service and has been in charge of the technical service together with the public officials.

The Plaintiff was employed as a security-based class and worked for two to three days, and worked for one day off, and from 18:00 to 08:00 on the next day, the Plaintiff worked for one month from 18:00 to 18:00 on the 1-3-day off duty.

(2) Meanwhile, in the case of B University, security guards worked from 9 A.M. to 6 P.M., night security guards from 6 P.M. to 8 A.M. on the following day, and whether or not to meet weekly expenses and night expenses are selected by security guards.

(3) Night security guards, including the Plaintiff, were assigned to the school building, such as the library and engineering museum. They worked in the guard room located inside the entrance of each building. From 10:00 to 6:00 a.m. following the opening of the entrance, they could rest in the guard room.

C. (1) The Plaintiff’s wage system for security guards, including the Plaintiff, applies to state public officials with regard to matters regarding appointment, personnel records, remuneration, salary class, service, disciplinary action, etc., which are not prescribed in the Regulations on Personnel of the Organizational Society.

arrow