logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2012.11.08 2012고단2644
사기
Text

A person shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for two months with prison labor for the crime No. 1 of the judgment of the defendant, and by imprisonment for eight months with prison labor for each crime.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 1, 2006, the Defendant was sentenced to three years of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daegu District Court on August 31, 2008, and the execution of the sentence has been terminated at the Ansan Prison on August 31, 2008. On April 28, 2010, the Busan District Court sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (non-licensed Driving) in the Busan District Court’s Dong Branch Branch, and the judgment was finalized on October 19, 201, and on September 30, 201, the Defendant was sentenced to ten thousand nine months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Attorney-at-Law Act and was finally decided on November 12, 2011.

1. On March 5, 2009, the Defendant: “AW” restaurant operated by the victim AV located in the Busan Metropolitan Transportation Daegu AU; even if the Defendant received meals from the construction site’s members, the Defendant, despite having no intent or ability to pay the cost, also belongs to the victim that “the Defendant would pay the cost of meal every 15 days on the high seas 10 persons,” and from that time, from the complainant who believed it, the Defendant would pay the cost of meal every 15 days on the high seas.

4. up to 30.30. not later than 30.0,000 won were provided with ten meals, and the price was not paid 2.529 thousand won.

Accordingly, the defendant was provided with meals equivalent to the above money by deceiving the victim.

2. On November 22, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim A, stating, “A shall be employed as a modern vehicle suspended from office by having well known inside X assistant officers, and by having requested them to do so.”

However, the victim did not have the intention or ability to find employment in the above company.

On the same day, the Defendant received KRW 31 million in total from the Korean bank account and the agricultural bank account in the AX name for teaching expenses.

In this respect, the Defendant acquired pecuniary benefits by deceiving the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to A and AV;

1. Each complaint;

1. Previous records: Criminal history records, etc., investigation reports (attached to the judgment of the court of first instance), and application of Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;

arrow