logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
red_flag_2
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2009. 4. 20.자 2009라116 결정
[면책][미간행]
Appellant (debtor)

Appellant

The order of the court below

Seoul Central District Court Order 2007Ma6872 dated November 21, 2007 (2007Hadan6872)

Text

The appeal of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

The reasoning of this court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: (a) changing "statement" in the first instance court's decision to "statement and inventory of property"; (b) "I have stated that the appellant has no insurance contract; and (c)" in the first instance court's decision to "I have stated that the appellant has no insurance contract;" and (d) "I have made a statement that the appellant has no insurance contract." (b)" In addition, except for adding "the debtor has purchased ○ Insurance Co., Ltd. at the time of the above application," as stated in the ground for the first instance's decision, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 33 of the Debtor Rehabilitation and Bankruptcy Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Therefore, the order of the court below is just, and the appeal of this case is dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Kim Jong-man (Presiding Judge)

arrow