1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are as follows: (a) the "total sum of passive property" stated in the table of section 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "61,634,732" and the "671,268,782" stated in the table of section 8 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed as "61,634,732"; and (b) the plaintiff's assertion to add or emphasize in the court of first instance shall be deemed as the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance

2. Additional determination

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) Even if the value of the Plaintiff’s active property at the time of the instant sales contract was KRW 859,593,140 above, the difference between the Plaintiff’s active property and the instant building is about KRW 53 million as a result of the said sales contract’s execution, and the Plaintiff’s active property was about KRW 859,59,593,140, and the total value of the instant land and buildings was about KRW 330,962,640 (i.e., KRW 178,200, KRW 152,762,640) reduced to KRW 528,630,50 (= KRW 859,593,140 - KRW 330,962,640) and KRW 286,000, KRW 760,000, KRW 2760,000, KRW 767,000.