1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of this court, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the corresponding part among the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main

제7면 3~14행을 아래와 같이 수정 ⑴ 무자력 여부 ㈎ 앞서 본 인정사실 및 갑 제10, 13호증, 을 제1호증의 각 기재에 변론 전체의 취지를 종합하면, 피고가 이 사건 토지의 매도대금을 지급받은 2014. 5. 13.과 2014. 5. 21. 및 2014. 6. 3. 당시 B의 적극재산과 소극재산은 아래 표와 같은 사실을 인정할 수 있다

[Attachment Table of Data on Property, etc. of Delinquent (No. 5) against B indicated as if B held shares of F and D ground buildings and G Co., Ltd. in addition to the land in this case. However, the following facts and circumstances are as follows, which can be acknowledged by Evidence No. 1-4 and Evidence No. 11; i.e., the above building was owned by one half of each of the defendant and E, and there was no acquisition of ownership of the building; ii) the company G was dissolved on October 1, 2013, and it cannot be deemed as having any property value of the shares; i.e., the total amount of KRW 1,860,250,000 for the land in this case, 19 active property indicated as No. 241,90, 250, 2000 won for the principal property in this case; and i.e., the total amount of KRW 241,907, 2301, 1360,197.14

갑 제10호증 소극재산 합계 368,312,810원 B의 순자산(= 적극재산 합계 - 소극재산 합계) 1,492,179,097원 ㈏ 따라서 B는 피고가 이 사건 토지의 가액에 상당하는 이 사건 토지의 매도대금을 수취함으로써 채무초과 상태에 이르렀다고 인정된다.

Table 11. table.