logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2013.12.12 2013고정3057
폭행등
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1.5 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and Defendant B are those who were victims D (E before the opening of their names) who were in office as a pastor in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Council (hereinafter referred to as the “HJ”) located in the F of Geumcheon-gu in Geumcheon-gu, Seoul.

1. The sole crime committed by Defendant A;

A. A. On April 26, 2009, the Defendant: (a) around the restaurant of the G School, the Defendant: (b) requested the victim D to have a talk in the party room; (c) on the ground that the victim refused to do so, the Defendant assaulted the victim by cutting down the victim’s lux belt and cutting down the victim’s lux belt.

B. Around July 22, 2009, the Defendant threatened the victim D, who prepared a new wall boat, with a view to “Isma, low fins, pule, pule, pule, low fins,” thereby threatening the victim as if he were going to the platform with micro-standard and going to the platform.

C. On March 19, 2013, the Defendant of defamation damaged the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by stating that, although the victim D did not have any money to the victim D, it would be “welved” and “I(LO) would have received money from the victim D.” on several occasions.

On November 21, 2010, the Defendant interfered with the worship, stating that he was “n'n't,” a large portion of the Do that had been towing by a low pastor within the main district of the Gn's Council, thereby interfering with the worship by avoiding the disturbance.

2. Defendants’ co-principal conduct

A. In collusion with the Defendants due to a false statement of false facts, the Defendants injured the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out false facts by openly pointing out false facts, despite the fact that the victim D was driving away from the Jorse Association. However, there were several names of sexual intercourses.

B. The Defendants’ defamation due to the statement of facts.

arrow