1. We affirm that the Defendant’s dismissal of the Plaintiff on September 6, 2013 against the Plaintiff is invalid.

2. The Defendant on September 7, 2013, to the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) On August 193, 1993, the Plaintiff graduated from the C College, and thereafter on February 2, 2010, obtained a doctorate from the D branch of the same C College. The Defendant is separate from the Defendant when referring to the said university (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant University”), and is “C University” when referring to the C branch of the Defendant University.

2) The Plaintiff was in charge of the common lecture of cultural subjects (hereinafter referred to as “F”) in the first semester for the year of 2010 immediately after obtaining a doctor’s degree, and the results of the lecture (participation by 62 out of 66 students) conducted by students with respect to the pertinent lectures were aggregated into 76 points.

(3) After the Plaintiff was recommended by E professor as an instructor in charge of culture (hereinafter “G”), the Plaintiff received a note from D on January 21, 2011, and on January 22, 201, to the effect that he received the relevant lecture from the teaching assistant in charge of D, but was notified from the same teaching assistant that “the Defendant University approved the Plaintiff’s lecture assignment to the Plaintiff” on the 25th day of the same month. The Plaintiff asserted that the above measures taken by the Defendant University constituted “unfair cancellation of lecture assigned” and continued to provide the Defendant University with corrective measures, withdrawal of lecture hours, etc. from August 8, 201 to July 7, 2013.

B. 1) During the process of one person’s demonstration against the Defendant University, the Plaintiff consulted with the vice president of the said university and the vice president of the said university, etc. about the future development issues. In particular, from June 2013, the Plaintiff is an affiliated research institute of the C University H Research Institute (hereinafter “Defendant University Research Institute”) established on May 2013.

hereinafter referred to as “instant research institute”

Between the Director I and I, the research institute of this case.