1. The Defendant’s KRW 5,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from February 12, 2014 to February 4, 2015.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 10, 2010, the Plaintiff received the support documents for faculty members at the above university, which was the invitation announcement of the professor recruitment with D of C University, and was appointed as a visiting professor with D of C University on December 27, 2010 after going through an interview with E, an honorary president of the above university.

The Plaintiff was on February 28, 2013 while serving in the pertinent university and retired from the post.

The defendant is currently working as C University D and professor.

B. On February 24, 2011, the Defendant found E, an honorary president of C college, to reverse the Plaintiff’s teaching appointment, and told that “A professor was divorced due to F hotel G president. A professor and G president are in a relationship. A professor and G president were in an internal relationship. In the event A professor and A professor were enrolled in a teaching training course prior to 10 years, I considered that G president and A professor came to work at the hotel. A professor’s character is not neglected.”

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant statement”). However, the Plaintiff did not have any relationship with the F hotel G president, but was not divorced due to G president, and there was no fact that the G president was present at the time of teaching training.

C. On the other hand, on February 24, 201, the Defendant and the above universities stated to the effect that “A’s scenarios are not produced by itself, not the honorary director of the above universities. A is a company which has been already closed down for a long time, and A has no record of holding office in the above company, with the aim of reconcing the Plaintiff’s faculty appointment.”

However, facts were that the plaintiff worked in the form of franchise in I, an advertising design corporation, and the scenarios submitted at the time of teaching were also produced by the plaintiff.

Accordingly, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant and H as a crime of defamation.

Accordingly, in a criminal trial (the Daejeon District Court 2012 High Court 2012 High Court 2012 High Court 1286 and Daejeon District Court 2013No1074), the verdict of innocence against the defendant and H was finalized.